Talk:Obor-knez

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Low-importance).

Again ?[edit]

It reads "From 1789–1791, Belgrade was again under Austrian rule" Nothing wrong with this sentence, except for the word again. Because the first Austrian rule (1718-1739) hasn't been narrated in the article. Either the first Austrian rule should be summarized or the word again should be omitted. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duke[edit]

The Slavic word "knez" is usually translated as "prince" or "duke" - but "obor-knez" is entirely different thing. An obor-knez was elected or appointed officer, so that position has nothing to do with the nobility.N Jordan (talk) 01:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]