|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
history doesn't go back very far
The history starts more or less with: "Some of the earliest forms of online community websites included TheGlobe.com (1994), GeoCities (1994), and Tripod.com (1995)"? What about Usenet (1980), PLATO (1973), or BBSs? --Delirium (talk) 01:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
misleading and missing information in "life cycle"
I am what the article considers a "lurker", yet this is not a circumstance I see I must "proceed forward" from. I am happy with my position relative to this community.
"outbound" also doesn't always happen that way, nor is it always so "pretty". often times the changes are not in the outbound person as implied, they are instead in the organization. Other times, "outbound" is not voluntary. people have been pushed out of most communities in cyberspace.
this is all very much an "idealized" view, more of what is expected to happen as opposed to reality; the corporate view as opposed to what actually happens. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
-- I would have to agree with your understanding of the title lurker. Each person within the life cycle or ecosystem has a level of need that must be present for a user to move beyond their current role. Look at Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs as a good base of backing. Also there are two different kinds of lurkers as well. One active and one passive. Thejournalizer (talk) 19:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
way to see total page views for "online community" ?
i want to see the total page views for "online community" article.. right now, i can see views at the link below, but only in 90 day durations and only by months. I am hoping to find the total views between January 11, 2010, and now. (This is for a research project involving Wikipedia and how Wikipedians define "online community")
thank you very much!!
How about some images?
Some skillfully-placed diagrams, figures, or appropriate representative photographs (i.e. not just the logo of someone's favorite website), would help improve the look of this article. --Animalparty-- (talk) 23:24, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Removed selfpub/poorly-cited section
I removed the "Lack of real-world social interactions" section in its entirety. It was originally added in a spate of WP:SELFPUB/spam referencing in 2012 - for detailed notes, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:220.127.116.11. This section appears to have been edited since then, and contains a huge string of uncited or poorly cited facts and no credible references. If this section is of great interest to someone, please fix at least some of the fact/clarifaction tags, and include credible references, before reverting. X14n (talk) 22:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Dr. Robert E. Kraut's comment on this article
Dr. Robert E. Kraut has recently published the following research publications which are related to this Wikipedia article:
Reference 1: Doing What Needs To Be Done: Effects of Goals in Self-Governed Online Production Groups, Number of Citations: 1, Year of Publication: 2011
Reference 2: Increasing commitment to online communities: Designing from theory, Number of Citations: 3, Year of Publication: 2010
Reference 3: Agent-based modeling to inform online community theory and design: Impact of discussion moderation on member commitment and contribution, Number of Citations: 5, Year of Publication: 2010
Reference 4: Regulating behavior in online communities, Number of Citations: 10, Year of Publication: 2012
Reference 5: Beyond information: Developing the relationship between the individual and the group in online communities, Number of Citations: 11, Year of Publication: 2010
Professor Robert E. Kraut has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
"The section on Online learning could be substantially reduced, with pointers to the E-learning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) - Wikipedia articles.
A Armstrong and J Hagel of the Harvard Business Review, addresses a handful of elements that are key to the growth of an online community and its success in drawing in members. HBR is a tertiary source & shouldn't be relied upon. There are many better reviews of what makes online communities success.
Amy Jo Kim's membership lifecycle's work is both old & impressionistic.
In this example, the article which was available on mendeley.com focuses specifically on online communities related to business, but its points can be transferred and can apply to any online community in general as well. This sounds like personal opinion, not verified info.
Learning trajectory in participation. Refer to Preece & Sheiderman's Reader to Leader Framework. But other research suggests that people who become heavy contributors are heavy at day one. E.g., Panciera, K., Halfaker, A., & Terveen, L. (2009). Wikipedians are born, not made: A study of power editors on Wikipedia Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work table of contents (pp. 51-60 ). New York: ACM Press. "
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.