Talk:Ontario Highway 81

Ontario Highway 81 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 12, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Canada Roads: Ontario Low‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly.

This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, add |needs-kml=no to the Canada Roads banner.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 81/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 19:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Redirect King's Highway 81 here.
And why does the article start with the alt name, not the common name.
- As per the ON 95 review, this is the legal name and the intro is boilerplate. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"first designated in 1936 and 1937" how could it be "first designated" twice?
"County Road 81" if an alt name, bold, redirect from there to here?
"Wrightmans Corners.[4][5] From Wrightmans Corners,..." repetitive.
"provincial highways today" see WP:CURRENTLY.
- For the previous, I agree, but I'm not sure how to approach this. This isn't something bound to change ever, but could you suggest an alternative wording. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"final 5 kilometres" five.
"shoreline of Lake Huron.[1][4][5]" overlinked.
"by 1950.[10] By 1952" repetitive.
"in 1965.[13][14] In 1969" likewise.
"premier" link?

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I replied to individual points, save for the last, and fixed the rest. It's difficult to reword that properly while having two non-consecutive links. However, it's a pretty quick link off Mike Harris (Ontario's favourite punching bag). Again, if you have a suggestion I'm more than open to using it, not only on this article, but on the dozens that use the same wording for the mass highway transfers in 1997 and 98. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions