|WikiProject Computing||(Rated B-class, High-importance)|
how is ogl being developed by SGI? i believe info in info box should read 'khronos', and SGI, ARB or whatever historical involvnemt should be mentioned somewhere in text, no? 184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Does OpenGL stand for Open Graphics Library?
I cannot find a reference that OpenGL actually stands for Open Graphics Library. Is it possible that OpenGL is simply a name by itself, and does not stand for anything? --Jephir (talk) 02:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Example needs info on how to run
The Examples section would benefit by explaining how one might actually try out the example code. Is there an OpenGL interpreter or compiler to execute the code? Or how would one submit that code to their graphics card? I suspect there are many answers to these questions, but a simple explanation of where to look would be apropos. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Add section on noteworthy implementations
I think a section on noteworthy implementations should be added -- preferably in a tabular format which includes entries with project name, developers, platforms it works on, GL compliancy level etc. For example
|Mesa3d||Mesa3d developers||X11, Windows, Mac OS X, OS independent, others||2.1||Active|
|nVidia drivers||nVidia||Windows, Linux/X11, Mac OS X||4||Active|
|ATI drivers||ATI/AMD||Windows, Linux/X11, Mac OS X||4||Active|
Could someone more knowledgeable of OpenGL devise a better, non-deprecated, helloworld-style example? I quickly looked at some of the more popular tutorials and their first examples are 200 lines of code, which kinda doesn't fit here imho. Anyways imho immediate mode code is not representative of modern OpenGL and it should either be revised or removed 18.104.22.168 (talk) 06:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- I've removed the example altogether. Deprecated code seems a bit too misleading, and it's not possible to write a concise-but-complete example using only the non-deprecated API. An example of the API could be pretty informative, but I can't come up with any code fragments which wouldn't be completely opaque to a casual reader (eg, binding and modifying a texture object).
- One alternative could be a section which describes the API in general terms - language-agnosticism, the difference between glColor3f and glColor4ub, the object-generation-and-binding system, the fact that state changes tend to carry a high performance cost and strategies used to avoid this, etc. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
I deleted the "written in" note a couple of weeks ago, but it's been restored with a reference. I'm deleting it again, and thought I'd better explain why.
The source cited seems pretty dubious. No references are given, and "OpenGL" could refer to Mesa3D, the OpenGL binding for Windows, the most commonly-used bindings, most OpenGL drivers, etc.
The entry could be replaced with something like "Written in: Multiple languages", but that seems sort of misleading. I think OpenGL's language-agnosticism is best represented by removing the entry altogether.
APPLE_flush_buffer_range in GL3?
I'm pretty sure what made it into OpenGL 3.0 was GL_ARB_map_buffer_range. The ARB extension borrows a little from Apple's earlier flush_buffer_range extension, but the final GL3 spec matches the newer ARB extension more closely (notably: it offers glMapBufferRange() like the ARB extension and not glBufferParameteri() like the Apple extension).
(EDIT: er, specifically, the ARB extension says it's a subset of the 3.0 functionality, made available for pre-3.0 implementations...so maybe the reference to APPLE_flush_buffer_range is correct as-is.)