Talk:Original 57 merit badges (Boy Scouts of America)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Scouting (Rated List-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Original 57 merit badges (Boy Scouts of America) is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Would there be any way to add images to the chart? (talk) 04:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

No. We had images in the main merit badge article, but they violated the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Using non-free images in lists fails the criteria. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 12:49, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Much as I'd love to have the images; I'm not sure NON-FREE images exist of all the images, much less free ones. Forget the fair use rationale, an existence rationale will do. Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 19:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Confused. All of the merit badges have an image available. I don't know what an existence rationale is. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 22:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Wow! The Invention merit badge has an image available? I thought that all the (10) of those awarded had disappeared? Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 22:20, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Handbook for Boys (1st ed.), Doubleday, Page, 1911, p. 35  ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 23:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! That's good for my own personal reference, at least Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 23:58, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Just had a thought, and yes: ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 12:57, 14 May 2010 (UTC)