Talk:Osama bin Laden death conspiracy theories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Death (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Pakistan (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United States / September 11, 2001 (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject September 11, 2001.
 
WikiProject Terrorism (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Alternative Views (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative Views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Skepticism (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

}}

If you know what this guy smokes, please let me know[edit]

Because I'd like to experience the after-effects myself. On Russia Today, radio host Alex Jones claimed that bin Laden had been dead for nearly ten years, and that his body had been kept frozen on ice ...In 2002, he claimed that an anonymous White House source had told him that bin Laden "is frozen, literally frozen and that he would be rolled out in the future at some date" OK, this is an article that deals with conspiracy theories. BUT all those theories I read (except for the ridiculous one with Hitler vs. the Illuminati) sounded plausible BUT this one. Frozen on ice? I'll stake my claim: this guy either regularly smokes something new yet to discover by others, or he was too much in theaters watching sci-fi movies. -andy 217.50.59.191 (talk) 21:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

this conspiracy theories are sickening me, how could something like Illuminati which (if ever existed) ended in 1800s still be taken serious? Russians ain't interested in UBL and some idiot around trying to get his or her "10 minutes of fame" on internet I'm gonna personally work on to start cleaning up wikipedia of all that crazy conspiracy garbage on a daily basis, many people come here to read for schools, this ain't a geek forum this is content for everyone — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.124.161.119 (talk) 05:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


Was the related conspiracy theories section intended to be humorous in nature? It sure seems that way.

202.65.158.226 (talk) 10:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Check ALL the sources of informtaion[edit]

Nowadays anyone can write a theory (even if they are really ridiculous) and publish it in a blog; moreover, this article collect many of the theories. However Wikipedia can not publish all the theories found on the web that dont have at least a valid reference. I found weird the theory of the sacrifice of Bin Laden. I expected at least a proper source of information to support this claim. When i clicked the link of the reference i was redirected to the Guardian.co.uk . In the beginning i believed the source was valid; however, when i read it i realized that the theory is not well researched. The Guardian took as the source of information a Wordpress article that can not be considered reliable. To sum up, at least this theory seems to have a reliable source (A Guardian article) but the source is only a poor research based on another article from Wordpress. That is the reason why i deleted this theory. Now we must be careful and check the current sources and the future sources. Some people are (deliberately or innocently) including references that fake to be reliable and valid. P.S English is not my native language, so there might be some grammatical mistakes. --Fukurou-san (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikileaks[edit]

http://rt.com/news/osama-body-wikileaks-stratfor-949/ Releere (talk) 19:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Stratfor[edit]

I saw an interesting part on the wiki page about the Stratfor hack/leak that led me to this article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Stratfor_email_leak#cite_ref-9

"An email involving a Stratfor analyst stated that it had been determined that up to 12 officials in Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency knew of Osama bin-Laden's safe house.[9] Another email indicated that Stratfor Vice President Fred Burton had knowledge of the killing of bin Laden, and that the body was not dumped at sea, but rather sent to Dover Air Force Base in the United States.[10] This further fueled doubts about the US Government's account of the killings.[11]"

I think this could be an interesting addition to this page, anyone agree/disagree?

Jacobitten (talk) 14:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I love that there is no evidence at all on the death of Osama. No legit photos, no body. They claim they have his DNA but that hardly proves anything. Yet, this is a "conspiracy theory". Since when not believing a completely unproven claim is a "conspiracy theory", and a claim with no evidence to back it up is deemed as a fact - even by wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.21.86.211 (talk) 12:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Rename this to 'Skepticism'?[edit]

There are some less far fetched skepticism on here such as "lack of evidence". That wouldn't really classify as a conspiracy theory would it? RocketLauncher2 (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)