From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Professional sound production (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs reworking[edit]

I am suggesting reworking our dubbing articles. Please see discussion at Talk:Dubbing. -- Infrogmation 18:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Confusion: overdubbing vs mutiple tracking vs sweetening[edit]

In the United States, the unions SAG and AFTRA seem to call overdubbing "multiple tracking" in their rules. See also this pdf with definitions: AFTRA INFORMATION REGARDING "MULTIPLE TRACKING" VS. "SWEETENING"

5Q5's post continued: Wikipedia has the articles Multitrack recording and History of multitrack recording, the latter which states "Multi-track recording differs from overdubbing and sound on sound because it records separate signals to individual tracks. Sound on sound which Les Paul invented adds a new performance to an existing recording by placing a second playback head in front of the erase head to play back the existing track before erasing it and re-recording a new track."

This is too confusing to me, as it is possible we are dealing with obsolete terms. Music is not my beat. I still don't know what it's called when you hear a singer's voice on a song sung in perfect harmony with themselves, sometimes for just seconds as an added effect. Multitracking, overdubbing, sweetening? Sigh. 5Q5 (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Reorganization by recording formats as a possible rewrite strategy[edit]

This seems already a quite useful article, but the history of 'overdubs' (and I use the term broadly and inclusively, I admit) might be best considered in terms of each format of recording. For example: -Cylinder recordings were, at first, recorded to other cylinder machines to be re-recorded (dubbed?) before being sold to the general public. -Edison Diamond disc recordings that were first obtained acoustically (without electrical microphones) were later re-released with electrically recorded orchestra backing. This could be considered a dub. This is partly represented in the article at the time of this comment, but perhaps could be expanded on. -Fully electrically recordings on 78 rpm discs were generally one take, but exceptions are surely there before L.P's. Most frequently people mention Les Paul as recording to one 78 rpm record, then playing along with that recording to record another disc recording as the birth of multi-track or dub recording. This may or may not be the case, but Les Paul seems to have had quite an effect on how often this process is applied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)