Talk:PC PowerPlay

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Wikiproject VG Reference library.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Professor Hershel Layton (1 participant)
David McGarry (1 participant)
Stumble Guys (4 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (5 participants)
Carlos Pesina (1 participant)
Atlus USA (4 participants)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants)
Koopa Troopa (8 participants)
Super Mutant (10 participants)
Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad (5 participants)
Police Trainer (0 participants; relisted)
Beam Invader (4 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (17 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (3 participants; relisted)
Silfade (2 participants; relisted)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (11 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (2 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (3 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (5 participants; relisted)
Dan Gelber (game designer) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled[edit]

Wolfenstein 3D recieved a 10/10 score, well before Psychonauts. I doubt this. PCPP #52 was using a 'out of 100'

scoring system. and this was dominant for some time.

Anyone want to confirm?

PCPP used a 10/10 scoring system for the first 5 or so issues, but then changed to percentage. Wolfenstein was the first (and only as of issue ~#50, when i stopped reading) game to receive 100% (10/10 in the old system) 134.7.77.147 08:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed - PCPP used a 10/10 scoring system for the first few issues, but then changed to the percentage system for the majority of its life thereafter. Churba 04:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, as an 'easter egg' of sorts, the 10/10 was a special retro-scoring system used only for Wolfenstein in that particular issue as it was part of a trial run of 'retro reviews'. They didn't last too long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.101.219 (talk) 11:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.nextmedia.com.au/pcpowerplay.html
- In PC PowerPlay on Mon Jul 17 14:21:57 2006, 404 Not Found
- In PC PowerPlay on Thu Jul 27 00:27:21 2006, 404 Not Found

maru (talk) contribs 04:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's fixed now - The link now points to The PCPP site. Churba 04:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changed forum link to match the actual location of the forum. forums.pcpowerplay.com.au is a redirect to www.pcpowerplay.com.au/forums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.101.219 (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crysis Issues =[edit]

A paragraph was added complaining about a specific review in a specific issue of the magazine. Removed this paragraph as it did not cite references, or even use correct spelling! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.28.183 (talk) 23:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of Forums[edit]

Should the rather active PCPP Forums be mentioned in the article? There is a column in the magazine for them, after all... 58.107.97.58 (talk) 09:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forum Creation Date Error[edit]

The forums were not created in 2002. November 2002 is when the original PCPowerPlay and sister (mother?) magazine Hyper forums (which were hand-coded and shared the same MS Access db) were converted over to phpBB2. The November 2002 date came into effect as a script was made to import the users of the forums. Interestingly, the method at the time involved giving users fair warning and asking them to put 'HYPER' or 'PCPOWERPLAY' in their forum signatures... User accounts with these values would be recreated in the 'new' phpbb2 forums. If a user had the same account name on both the Hyper and PCPP forums, they could put 'HYPER PCPOWERPLAY' in their sig. Whichever came first was the data replicated to both new forum installs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.101.219 (talk) 11:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not listing all of the regulars[edit]

I really don't think that this page should list all of the regular sections of the magazine (in the "main sections" part). It should just say something like "there are opinion pieces and hardware benchmarks", etc. It looks unprofessional, and it's unnecessary for people wanting to know about the magazine. Atroche (talk) 13:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is a magazine page after all. If we did not include the sections, there would be nothing to write about! :P Tonyxc600 (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cover, format edits, corrections[edit]

Added cover art, shall photoshop the modern logo to add above (much like HYPER>> and Gamestar.
Also correcting many things (e.g: Found "It has" rather than "It had" for deleted sections no longer used). AND aside from correcting CD-ROM and DVD-ROM links, also added the fact that BOTH editions existed while gamers made the (expensive) transition. It was like DVD to BR ended up when that came out.
- CertifiableNut (talk) 12:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edited all the way to scoring system, taking a break. - CertifiableNut (talk) 12:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]