Talk:PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB / Cell Signaling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Cell Signaling task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Diagram[edit]

A diagram would be nice. Ideally something more relevant than Signal transduction v1.png (>) which doesn't show mTOR.

I've used the MTOR-pathway diagram from mTOR (below/right) for now.

It shows mTOR but includes more than we need.

Rod57 (talk) 16:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite Dec 2014[edit]

I plan on completely redoing the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway page from Wikipedia. I will discuss multiple targets of the PI3K/AKT pathway. I will discus its various effects on controlling the proliferation or differentiation of neural stem cells. I will discuss modern, neural therapeutic techniques that are being researched. I will also talk about its effects in LTP. I will be starting this page from scratch as there is nothing there now that I didn’t either restate or is insignificant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.43.220.97 (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like 149.43.220.97 did it on the 7th Dec (and that IP has done nothing else). Seems unbalanced now to focus on neural issues. The information re cancer in the previous version seems lost/buried. Needs rebalancing - perhaps find a recent review ? - Rod57 (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temp could put old page in a new section on Cancer - Rod57 (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of copies of same reference - not named and shared[edit]

I fixed one - then realised there were many more. (Possibly introduced by Dexbot Aug 2015.) - Rod57 (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]