Talk:Painkiller Jane (TV series)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

External Links[edit]

[link removed]

This should be left in because it is the only fan-run website on the net for this show and thus the biggest. It is run by the same people who brought you the biggest Eureka guide on the net.

You have absolutely no reason to remove it other than your own personal dislike for it being there.

I'm contributing a lot to this page. I deserve some sort of reward for that don't I??

Can't the people who run the Eureka page run this as well? I never had any trouble with the link on the Eureka page like I'm having here.

Seriously - conflict of interest? What on Earth are you talking about? So its conflict of interest to put a link to another site about a TV show? Hmm... lets remove IMDB. Lets remove TV.com. Lets remove SciFi.com - get my point here? Painkiller-Jane.com has as much right to be on there as any of those sites.

Please just leave it there, move on and start building the page instead of trying to delete a link for no reason. Whats more important - this page having content, or you getting rid of a link? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VisitEureka (talk • contribs).

I'm sorry, but your own arguments support my theory that this is a serious conflict of interest and spam issue. You should read the WP:COI, WP:EL, and WP:SPAM guidelines. Wikipedia articles cannot be "owned", and Wikipedia does not serve for a certain group to advertise itself. Comparing the Painkiller Jane website to IMDb, SciFi.com, etc. is a stereotypical incorrect argument for keeping a website in the external links. Chicken Wing 21:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An attempt has been made by an administrator (me) to warn VisitEureka about adding links to commercial and/or personal sites. VisitEureka may like to know that we operate a blacklist system and can blacklist from all Wikimedia-run websites any link that is continually added. Additionally, adding a link here does not improve your Google PageRank. It can actually harm it. Wikipedia works in co-operation with Google to embrace the "nofollow" command. Google and other search engines disregard links from us to other sites. This can drive down a PR and make a site less popular. REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 22:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PKJTitleCard.jpg[edit]

Image:PKJTitleCard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]