Talk:Pakistan Movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Pakistan (Rated B-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.
 
WikiProject South Asia (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject History  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 04:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Tehrik-e-Pakistan[edit]

I suggest using the "Tehrik-e-Pakistan" or "Tehrik e Pakistan" name as a redirect to the Pakistan Movement page.Suprah™ 15:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I have also redirected Tehrik-e-Pakistan to the articel as well.--IslesCapeTalk 16:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Malhi[edit]

May I request anon editors to provide proper references for the claims of Malhi's national leadership, otherwise his name is very well situated in the article.--IslesCapeTalk 22:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Muhammad Ali Jinnah.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Muhammad Ali Jinnah.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Layout[edit]

Shouldn't the conclusion section be in the lead section as this is an encyclopedia article and not an essay?

Statistic does not back claim - Is statistic correct? What is the source?[edit]

The paragraph that begins "In 1909" under Muslim Minorities section states that "In the United Provinces, Muslims made up only 1/4th of the population but held 18% of the civil service jobs." The paragragh insinuates that the Muslim minority, an elite group, was over-represented, but if 25% of population was Muslim, then wouldn't 18% in civil service jobs be an under-representation (18 < 25)? Sherylchilders6 (talk) 07:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it's like this article is trying to rebuild the case for Pakistan. As a newcomer to this entire historical debate I feel it would be incorrect for me to rework this. However, if anyone could please clean this up, it would be incredibly beneficial. As it stands I feel like someone is using this article for political purposes. If the case for Pakistan is difficult to reconcile with the numbers presented here, that should be represented in the article. This is still a very touchy subject, which is exactly why I'm interested, but that just requires greater scrutiny for accuracy and objectivity. marnues (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Questionable sentence[edit]

"The Muslim elite of UP saw their influence being challenged by the Hindu elite who benefited from their much more speedy integration into the English medium education system." This statement is unclear, has grammar issues, and is of questionable bias. Could we see some statistics and expounding on this, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherylchilders6 (talkcontribs) 07:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Clean up due[edit]

I will be performing a clean up of this article after 48 hours of posting this notice. Until that time, anyone can add required references and remove unverifiable cruft. Thanks. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 16:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Kindly move the content removed to the talk page as I might be interested in finding the sources over time and adding back. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Removed content[edit]

For record, this content was removed as it was unsourced (to be added back if sources are found): [1]. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Jinnah port.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Jinnah port.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Road Bike Front Wheel Clincher 50MM Spoke Black[edit]

[url=http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/29er-carbon-fiber-mountain-bike-framesycmsf05-p-716.html]Frame fork[/url] Specialized enters the disc-brake road-bike market with the Secteur, built for endurance riders. Ranking just below the carbon-fiber Roubaix in Specialized’s model line, [url=http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/700c-carbon-clincher-rims-40mm-with-aluminium-brake-surface-single-rim-3k-glossy-p-683.html]Clincher Rims[/url] the Secteur shares the higher-end bike’s stable geometry, but relies on the company’s A1 aluminum tubing for the frame. [url=http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/700c-carbon-road-bike-wheelset-clincher-50mm-3k-glossy-disc-brake-red-spoke-black-p-677.html]Road Bike Spoke[/url] While the Secteur was designed to invoke the feel and handling of the Roubaix, the bike also takes many cues from the [url=http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/700c-carbon-road-bike-front-wheel-clincher-50mm-12k-glossy-disc-brake-black-spoke-black-p-770.html]black spoke[/url] Tricross adventure road bike. The Secteur uses the same seatstays and monocoque carbon fork as the Tricross, though the fork’s trail is altered slightly for road riding. [url=http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/700c-carbon-road-bike-front-wheel-clincher-50mm-3k-glossy-disc-brake-red-spoke-black-p-678.html]Disc Brakes[/url] We rode a prototype Secteur at Interbike’s Outdoor Demo in Boulder City, Nevada.

[img]http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/images/v/190/1.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/images/v/190/2.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.discountcarbonbicycle.com/images/v/190/4.jpg[/img] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jixxcxv (talkcontribs) 08:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)