Talk:Palpung Monastery

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tibet

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Palpung Monastery/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

the problem is that first of all the information given is not really correct. generally, a monastery is never founded by a political person but a religious one only, becomingits abbot. secondly, the year of foundation is not correct. thirdly the suggestion to integrate the article palpung into the article palpung monastery would be incorrect since palpung is much more than a monastery in old tibet, rather it is the name of a congregation of monasteries and centers around the world. this being the case, the article palpung is the most complete which integrated parts of the article palpung monastery. i would therefore suggest to dissolve the palpung monastery article.--Sherab1180 (talk) 18:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 02:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)