Talk:Panait Cerna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Panait Cerna has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Arts and Entertainment (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
 
WikiProject Bulgaria (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Journalism (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Romania (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Stock post message.svg
To-do list for Panait Cerna:
No to-do list assigned.

category[edit]

why did you put Panain Cerna on the "romanian expatriate to Germany" if he was a romanian citizen ? Don't you know that an expatriate person means a person that is born is a country and is found in another one. He then asks or the authorities decide to expatriate to his home-country and then his in flight status on his way home is "expatriate". Please don't confuse emigrant to expatriate, or emigrant to the person that gains a foreign citizenship by marriage. Bogdan 188.25.52.176 (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

The disruptive user above apparently has no clue as to the meaning of the word "expatriate". Dahn (talk) 09:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

Reviewer: Homunculus (talk · contribs) 07:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I'll start reviewing this one. Might take a couple days to complete.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Overall not bad, but a few readability issues. Some of these are suggestions may reflect personal preferences, so you don't have to implement if you disagree. I also went ahead and made some edits myself. I am not done reviewing, so will add more here soon.
    • "Cerna became the group's main representative during its decline, affiliating with both competing Junimist magazines, Convorbiri Literare and Convorbiri Critice." — how about just "Cerna became the group's main representative during its decline, contributing to both major Junimist magazines, Convorbiri Literare and Convorbiri Critice."
    • "This characteristic earned him a dedicated following, but was criticized by many of his peers, who found it artificial and outdated." — What, exactly, is the characteristic being referred to which his contemporaries found outdated and contrived? His intellectualism? His writing style? It's not really clear.
    • "Although his links to Bulgarian culture were weakened by the latter's departure..." — I assume "the latter" refers to his father, and changed accordingly.
    • " This, he argues, was one of the few areas in which Junimea still differed from Sămănătorul, which was more open to less elitist environments." — Elitist environments? What does it mean for a literary movement or society to be more or less open to particular environments? Does this mean that the Sămănătorul was more inclusive?
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Looks alright, but a question to the author: I've seen a number of different approaches to including poetry or other excerpts of written works. Is there a standard presentation, or is it fine to use different styles as long as there is consistency within the article?
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    I am unable to verify most of the references, as they are not in English, but formatting looks fine and page numbers included, so I'm going to AGF.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Looks thoroughly referenced
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Might benefit from a one-sentence introduction to the Junimea literary society. Maybe something like "...By that time, he was discovered by Junimea—an influential Romanian intellectual association founded in 1863" (or something to that effect).
    B. Focused:
    I think we're good here.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
Pretty straightforward.
  1. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article history could not possibly be less interesting.
  2. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Not a big deal, but it would be nice if we had an approximate date on the portrait. If not available, no worries.
  3. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
  • I've Yes check.svg done the majority of them and cannot find the date on the image. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Alright, I'm satisfied. Thanks for nominating this one! Homunculus (duihua) 22:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)