Talk:Participatory design

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Human Computer Interaction (Rated GA-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Computer Interaction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human Computer Interaction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 



Is this about design of software, design of clothing, design of buildings, or what? And why the capital letter "D" in "Design", rather than lower-case? Michael Hardy 18:25, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I moved the above comment here from the main article. I hope I answered the question with the small rewrite I did. Actually I think it could apply to design of anything, since it's more of a general procedure or principle to involve the user.
I did the rewrite because it was almost word for word from the website I added as an External link, the very first Google hit. This looks like an excellent topic, and this stub should be a good start. I left the capital in Design for now because it was that way on the web site, although that may be just because it was title case. Spalding 22:10, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)

Jargon sentence cut[edit]

Jargon sentence cut from article: "Participatory design is often associated with emancipation of end-users." Jargon-y enough to make it vacuous. If someone has something to say here, say it clearly. - Jmabel | Talk 01:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

If you read paper about the topic, that's the wording used. - Pedro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.92.166.144 (talk) 02:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Merge with User-design[edit]

Participatory design seems to be a common industry term. I haven't heard of User-design. The hyphen format doesn't make a whole lot of sense either. The [google results] are low compared to part. design and the results are for the non-hyphenated term. Clubmarx | Talk 17:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Single-source and Inline-cites-needed tags[edit]

I'm assuming these tags are just for the non-"Scandinavia" sections? There seems to be plenty of sources and inline citations, just not really anywhere other than the "in Scandinavia" part.... (That section's information needs some integration into the rest of the article, too, as I'm sure it's not so useful to just talk about Scandinavian research contexts.) —AySz88\^-^ 03:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

thanks a good point. But please note that this approach to design started in Scandinavia - as described in the referred papers. -A, Dec 1, 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.92.166.144 (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)