Talk:Patek Philippe & Co.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Watches  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of watches on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
 
WikiProject Companies  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Switzerland (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

[edit] Neutrality

The lead is nigh but promotional garbage. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

I think I fixed it -- Domino111Talk 02:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.32.249 (talk)

I believe the following sentence (IN THE ANNIVERSARY PARAGRAPH) to be in error: "...including the date of Easter, Hanukkah, Ramadan, body temperature, a thermometer, time of sunrise, equation of time, sidereal time,'. Most of the listed complications are correct except Date of Ramadan, Hanuka and Body Temperature. Horology (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

The lead and much of the rest of the article were written promotionally, as two editors noted above. I would ask whoever wrote this material originally to please observe the policies of WP:NPOV, WP:NOTADVERTISING, and, of course, the core WP:V, as well as the guidelines of WP:TONE and WP:DATED — all of which this article violated. --Tenebrae (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
As I have just posted at the anon-IP talk page User talk:124.122.173.153, "Your blanket revert at Patek Philippe & Co. violates a number of Wikipedia policies, including core policies at the heart of this encyclopedia. Please read the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. "Common wisdom" is NOT allowed. Everything has to be verified by WP:RS cites. If you revert again to the policy-violating version after this warning, this may be considered vandalism by an admin, who will be contacted. It is important to read and understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines before editing." --Tenebrae (talk) 15:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export