This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
How do I change the title of an article? For this article we need to change it from Path.com to just Path. Rbakal (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
It would not be appropriate to call the article "path", as that is a disambiguation page that refers to quite a few different articles and things that go by the name "path". Normally, if the correct name for the subject is "x" and "x" is already taken by a disambiguation page or another company, you would add a description in parenthesis, so "path (company)" or "path (web service)", etc. There's a subtle question, is this article about the company ("path, inc?"), the website (indeed, "path.com"), or the service (which is whatever path calls it, possibly just "path"). I hope that's clear. Anyway, there used to be a "rename article" or "move" tab somewhere at the top. You might check out WP:MOVE or ask the "help desk" for instructions. If it's controversial you might want to discuss or start a requested move procedure. Here it's probably not controversial so you can just go ahead and do it if it's technically feasible. - Wikidemon (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
I agree that we should not make it ambiguous. Perhaps a better name would be Path (social network). Thoughts? Rbakal (talk) 20:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No argument, seems uncontroversial. Move. MacMedtalkstalk 21:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have added a brief description of path's new service, but this page on the whole seems to be unsure whether or not to class path.com as the social network or the company. Biggles1000 (talk) 11:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
This page has now become obsolete! whiskers75 (talk) 07:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)