Talk:Pedro Mountain Road

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't have the Barbara VanderWerf 'Montara Mountain' book handy, but I am pretty sure that I recall that she writes that that Highway 1 did not replace Pedro Mountain Road. Instead, Highway 1 replaced another road, connecting from Higgen's Road, and running to the east, crossing over the 'saddle' at Montara Mountain. I vaguely recall that this road was called 'Route ##', but am not sure the ##. I do recall a conversation with an old person who recalled driving this road. Remnants of the road exist today, and are used for mountain biking. What Vanderwerf calls the Pedro Mountain Road remnants also exist today, and connect to the Shamrock Ranch and are primarily used as a horse trail. My memory may be wrong, this should be confirmed with the Vanderwerf book. Here is a link to a Google Earth route (in kml format) of the [1] of what I believe is the route of the road featured in the photos in the article. The Higgens road is distinct, see this kmz file [[2] I might have this backwards, but it should be checked. SaltyBoatr 20:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am planning to do some more research on possible changes of the routing of the coastal highway. Although I no longer live in Montara, California, as I did from 1985 to 1989, I still return to the area once a year. I also want to verify the date that the Devil's Slide highway was opened. Sallyrob —Preceding comment was added at 17:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PedroMountain.jpg[edit]

Image:PedroMountain.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PedroMtnRd 3.jpg[edit]

Image:PedroMtnRd 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]