This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
"The raw periodogram is not a good spectral estimate because of spectral bias and the fact that the variance at a given frequency does not decrease as the number of samples used in the computation increases."
It would be nice to track down the original source instead of referencing a reference. I unfortunately don't have time to make for this, since I am less interested in mathematics than applications. The Welch method also needs some research. -rs2 17:25, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
difference between periodogram and spectrum?
It would be nice to see an explanation of why the term "periodogram" is used to refer to a technique that, in practice, estimates power density with respect to frequency instead of with respect to period.. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
It's simply because around the turn of the century, the word for a periodic function was "periodic", not "frequent".....so people searched for "periodicities", not "frequencies". And they still do. Andersen has, indeed, plumped for renaming the periodogram the "spectrogram" but this has not caught on.22.214.171.124 (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)