This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
Yes, this is an embarrassing retraction, but one should guard against exaggerating its importance. Although the glycosylated amino acid is important for medical applications, it's still just one amino acid; as of now more than FIFTY unnatural amino acids have been successfully incorporated into genetic codes using Schultz's method, and documentation for all except the retracted one IS available. SingingZombie (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
UPDATE: Someone has removed the section on the retraction. Hey, I was not calling for the section on the retraction to be REMOVED; just saying it's not the end of his career; he's still on the short list for the Nobel Prize. SingingZombie (talk) 17:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
"Someone", it should be noted, with an IP address belonging to The Scripps Research Institute. --220.127.116.11 (talk) 18:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
The content was unsourced, and not exactly neutrally phrased. It was correctly removed per WP:BLP, irrespective of who did it. Rockpocket 06:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Described apparatus for high-throughput bioassays of many compounds on small cell-colonies in microwells, 1536 wells per plate. Included PNAS reference which is on very topical subject: de-specializing cells, inducing pluripotency without using genetic material like DNA, RNA, retrovirus etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 05:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)