|
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page. |
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page. |
|
Delete "a compassionate and great human being" ? [edit]
While this may be true for those who know the guy, does it really belong in an encyclopedia article?
- I'm imagining a Reliable Source for the assertion. "In addition, a New York Times survey of psychology and communication professionals concurred that Peter Salus was a top bloke"? - David Gerard 13:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Finding his universities [edit]
This web search can be used to generate book and journal citations, that will list Salus' universities: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Peter+Salus&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C22&as_sdtp=on
There might even be a short bio in one of them that would making the additions easier. Lentower (talk) 23:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Two Photos? [edit]
two photos. is there a reason for this? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Why not? The caption on the second adds some color and interest to the article. Lentower (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)