Talk:Peter Nijkamp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Energy  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Economics  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Why is the opinion of Mr. Arnold Heertje included? He is not involved and he has an opinion about everything. I think his opinion does not carry enough weight to be included. Andries (talk) 07:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

The Controversy[edit]

It's true, it happened, it's all over the papers in The Netherlands. Quite serious scientists and media support the allegations, some even speaking of "factfree science". But that does not mean it should be in Wikipedia - to this extent. It unbalances the article and the reflist. It should be worded with more caution and restraint. Regards, Sander1453 (talk) 13:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)