Talk:Pewterschmidt family

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

A quick note: Lincoln hiring black prostitutes at Cherrywood is fiction. Whether this has any basis in fact would best be discussed at the article on Lincoln. Cromulent Kwyjibo 20:22, 30 July 2005 (UTC) (See also Talk: Police Squad!.)[reply]

Chuckie[edit]

What episode was he metioned?

Carter[edit]

Didn't Carter once try and outright bash Peter's skull in?

Lots42 22:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kate Pewterschmidt.jpg[edit]

Image:Kate Pewterschmidt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory info[edit]

Barbara's entry says she never had an affair with Jackie Gleason. So what made Lois's brother go nuts? Lots42 01:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Patrick pewterschmidt.jpg[edit]

Image:Patrick pewterschmidt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Pewterschmidt family.jpg[edit]

Image:Pewterschmidt family.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, German or English?[edit]

On this page it says that the Pewterschmidts were amount "the first families to colonize America from England". On Lois Griffin page it says "Lois Pewterschmidt Griffin was born into a wealthy German American family the Pewterschmidts".
So, which one is more correct? Judging by the lastname, I think it's German but then I could be wrong. Any opinions?

Pewterschmidt cat?[edit]

A section to this article has been added saying the Pewterschmidts have a pet cat named Debutante who will try to seduce a character named "Alfred Griffin." Unless I am mistaken, I heard that this "Alfred" character is Meg's future son, though this may likely be a scandal. Immblueversion (talk) 20:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Margueritte Pewterschmidt[edit]

This text Other examples include PTV, while Peter and Lois are watching Meg's play. I Think this text is wrong, because, in PTV When aunt Margueritte appear in the Meg's Play she was lives.

One question: How old was Meg in that scene of PTV?, Other question, When Margueritte dies, how old are Meg?. --Ravave (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

Merge Yes, I think this should be merged with List of characters in Family Guy. I don't see why this is has its own page. It's more TV trivia on Wikipedia.George Pelltier (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The List of characters in Family Guy is long but I think the merge is a good idea too, much as I enjoy Family Guy. -- Horkana (talk) 02:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This as been up for months with no opposes, so I'm merging it. CTJF83Talk 16:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]