Talk:Pharmaceutical industry in China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Pharmacology (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject China (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Merger proposal[edit]

Pharmaceuticals in China article has the same intent as this, but is better laid-out and a bit more coherant. Neither article cite many sources. Certainly don't need two articles unless we're going to make a good split between the Pharma industry and Pharma companies themselves. (mordel 13:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC))

I support this merger. The article seems to have been abandoned by the history so go for it!--BirgitteSB 16:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I think the merger should take place, as Pharmaceutical companies in China has been tagged for clean up for almost 2 years, and something needs to be done to it very soon. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 19:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
My only reservation is that neither article have sourced statements, so I can't even begin to understand what's good information or not. I'll try a few small moves to start...--mordel (Talk - Contribs) —Preceding comment was added at 19:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Merger complete: this page could hold useful information at a further date, if someone wishes to do a good business analysis of the industry in China. Top-tens, business trends, important historical dates. Sourced, of course ;-) --mordel (Talk - Contribs) 22:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

This article is not neutral, lacks citation and uses misleading and untrue information. Claims include regulation on par with the US. This page seems to purposefully ignore all of the counterfeit drugs being knowingly and purposefully produced in china and the deadly effects these medications have had. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.208.241.185 (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Neutrality and Lack of Citations[edit]

This page needs reworking as it is obviously biased to make China's pharmaceutical industry appear more well regulated than it is. It ignores counterfeiting and the deadly effects of China produced medication. Also it uses a lot of vague terms and lacks citation when on claims of increased regulation.

More importantly, however, is the fact that the companies listed under this page are clearly advertising themselves, using loaded words such as "world-class facilities today. Bayer's investment in our integrated production site in the Shanghai Chemical Industry Park makes it evident that Bayer regards Greater China as one of its most important markets worldwide." emphasis on "Bayer's investment in OUR integrated..."... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.232.67.172 (talk) 07:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)