|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Would Microsoft Live Labs Photosynth and Google Street View be considered examples of Photogrammetry applications? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Both packages employ 3D models, Photosynth via photogrammetry, Google on the other hand may not generate its models from images. --krioboy 00:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Should we mention Photosynth, we should also mention other software packages typically used in photogrammetric reconstructions (Autodesk Imagemodeler, EOS Photomodeler). Photosynth is nice, it has inovative user interface, but the algorithms (calibration, matching) are "just" implementation of already known algorithms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 11:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
This is an individual's opinion, not fact nor consensus. Photogrammetry forms the very foundation of so-called "Geomatics" (which itself is the fusion of geophysics, geography, engineering, geology, geodesy, surveying and computer science) and is constantly being used as more and more planet observation satellites are launched for remote sensing. Satellite stereo photogrammetry plays a crucial role in updating terrain maps (DTM, DEM), hydrology maps and furthering our knowledge of the geoid in great detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxbuck (talk • contribs) 19:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, the section was clearly original research and entirely lacking in references or citations, so contributes nothing to a reader's understanding of the subject. No reason not to add it back if the claims can be substantiated, but as it stands it says nothing verifiable, so I deleted it. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Should this article mention Photofly and how cloud computing is now allowing a wider audience to use photogrammetry?
Move software table to its own page?
Should the table of software be moved to its own wiki page, e.g. "Comparison of Photogrammetry Software"?