This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
A fact from Pixel artist appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 11 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 3715 times (disclaimer)(check views). The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
First step in getting this rescued is to add some sources. Does anyone have any? Jclemens (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm looking into it. I think this is rescuable but will see what I can find first. Banjeboi 06:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Move sections not concerning pixel artists specifically
Just restating what I proposed in the deletion discussion:
I think we should keep the paragraphs that talk specifically about pixel artists (such as the first paragraph of the "Background" section) but move most of the information which describes pixel art into the pixel art article, while taking care to not lose anything from either article. My rationale is that there's no sense in having two articles with in-depth descriptions of pixel art. So while it would be good to have a short summary of just what exactly pixel art is in this article, all in-depth information should be in one place. As an example, see the difference between the animator and animation articles. This article currently has a lot of information about pixel art that the "pixel art" article does not have, and vice versa, so I would ask whoever does the merge to be careful and make sure that no information falls by the wayside. Esn (talk) 05:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
I completely agree. This article is now a better article on "pixel art" than pixel art is, so the content which is on here and not currently there should be merged. --Slashme (talk) 06:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
I believe a Pixel Artist is someone who does, specifically Pixel Art. nor the process described here suit more the term digital artist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 05:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Agreed, it describes pixel art to an extent, but it seems ATM more like an article on digital art in general. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 13:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)