Talk:Planetary objects proposed in religion, astrology, ufology and pseudoscience

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Astronomy (Rated C-class, Bottom-importance)
WikiProject icon Planetary objects proposed in religion, astrology, ufology and pseudoscience is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Bottom  This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Mythology (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Paranormal (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
Archive
Archives

Untitled[edit]

Structure of article[edit]

Would it not be better if the article was structured in chronological order of when these proposals emerged? So: Central Fire (BC), Smith (1830s), Lilith (1918), Hubbard (1950s), Ummo (1960s), Sitchin (1970s), Serpo (1980s?), Rizq (1990s?). Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Chronological or alphabetical, both are fine to me. Serendipodous 18:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


Nibiru[edit]

Someone needs to add a section about Nibiru to this article as it is one of the more talked about crackpot pseudoplanets — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.6.113 (talk) 04:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

It is discussed, under "Planets proposed by Zecharia Sitchin". Serendipodous 08:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

re-directed again[edit]

... to the newly created Pythagorean astronomical system --BoogaLouie (talk) 16:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Rizq[edit]

According to the linked W article, York claims not to be a contactee, but to be from the planet Rizq.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 03:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Kolob[edit]

Don't know how to add a section to the main page: would Kolob not count?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 03:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Kolob was removed, if I remember correctly, because it's a star, not a planet. Serendipodous 06:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

good point. Can unnamed planets be mentioned? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:36, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I suppose so, if they can be sourced. Serendipodous 00:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I notice that the Wikipedia entry for Kolob says it is a "star or planet". Does reference to another Wiki article count as referenced? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Autosourcing Wikipeida is not accepted, if only because Wikipedia changes all the time. Serendipodous 00:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

thanks.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)