Talk:Planets beyond Neptune

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Planets beyond Neptune is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
WikiProject Solar System (Rated FA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Solar System, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Solar System on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
For more information, see the Solar System importance assessment guideline.
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated FA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon Planets beyond Neptune is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
 FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
 

[edit] Just Came Across This

Just came across this recent article discussing anomalies in the orbit of the moon and possible causes. The maths are beyond me, but it looks like a bona-fide scientific paper. Maybe someone with more astronomical knowledge than I possess could stitch it into the article in some relevant way. Thanks

http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0212 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.37.108 (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Woah. So, let me see if I have Dr Lorio's argument straight. A transneptunian planet can cause noticeable changes to the orbit of our Moon from a distance of ~3 billion miles, but has no effect on the planets? Personally I'd need a LOT of corroboration before I decided to let that one in. But that's just me. Serendipodous 10:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't think he's saying that a transneptunian planet is the most likely explanation (see the end of the article). And from my admittedly very limited knowledge, I doubt if the orbits of the planets can be measured with anything like the same accuracy as can that of the moon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.37.108 (talk) 23:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Iorio himself says that "the values for the physical and orbital parameters of such a hypothetical body required to obtain the right order of magnitude for de/dt are completely unrealistic." I see no need to add a claim that the paper itself debunks. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export