|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative Views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. |
|
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 2 months may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
 |
Please be neutral when editing this highly sensitive article. It discusses a topic about which people have diverse opinions. |
 |
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed.
Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.
|
Mediation, arbitration,
requests for clarification, and
other discussions about the
LaRouche movement, 2004-2008
|
| Long term abuse subpage, LaRouche accounts |
ArbCom clarification/enforcement,
AN/I, 2005-8
|
- Enforcement, Hershelkrustofsky socks, Sep 19, 2008
- Enforcement, MaplePorter, Sep 19, 2007
- Clarification, Nathan/DLTN, July 23, 2007
- Enforcement, Herschelkrustofsky (HK)
- Clarification, Tsunami Butler", Apr 1, 2007
- Clarification, Appeal, Jan 24, 2007
- Clarification, ManEatingDonut, Nov 22, 2006
- Clarification, LaRouche, Oct 23, 2006
- HK probation, Apr 15, 2006
- HK/BirdsOfFire, Mar 31, 2006
- HK blocked, Sep 29, 2005
|
| Arbitration 2006 |
|
|
| Arbitration 2005 |
- N_ and others, Nov 2005.
- Cognition's statement, Nov 22, 2005.
- Modification of LaRouche 2, Dec 23, 2005.
- HK indef probation, Dec 23, 2005
- LaRouche 2, Jan 25, 2005–Feb 17, 2005.
- LaRouche 2 talk
- LaRouche 2 evidence
- LaRouche 2 proposed decision
- LaRouche 2 proposed decision talk
|
| Arbitration 2004 |
|
|
| Mediation 2006 and 2007 |
|
|
| Mediation 2004 |
|
|
| Article talk 2004-2007 |
- Talk:Lyndon LaRouche
- Lyndon LaRouche 1, Jan 17–Jun 17, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 2, Jun 20–22, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 3, Jun 21–24, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche draft, June 24-25, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 4, Jun 25–July 5, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 5, Jul 05–Aug 1, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche/Jewish, June–Aug 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche HK list, July–Aug 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche HK list archive
- Lyndon LaRouche 6, Aug 6-9, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 7, Aug 11-17, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche omissions, Sep 9-10, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 8, Aug 18–Sep 28, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 9, Sep 18–Oct 11, 2004
- Lyndon LaRouche 10, Dec 2004–Jan 20, 2005
- Lyndon LaRouche archive, material missing
- Lyndon LaRouche 11, Jan 20–Jul 19, 2005
- Lyndon LaRouche 12, Jul 2005–Nov 12, 2006
- Lyndon LaRouche 13, Nov 2006—Feb 18, 2007
- Lyndon LaRouche 14, Feb 18, 2007 - August 1, 2007
- Lyndon LaRouche 15, August 8, 2007 - November 18, 2007
- Lyndon LaRouche 16, November 20, 2007 -
- Lyndon LaRouche 17
- Lyndon LaRouche 18
|
- Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche
- Political views temp
- Political views 1, Aug 21–Nov 29, 2004
- Political views 2, Dec 2004–Jan 11, 2005
- Political views 3, Jan 2005–Oct 02, 2006
- "Cooked quotes", Jan 22–23, 2005
- Political views mediation, Feb 27–Mar 04, 2006
- Political views 4, Oct 23, 2006–Oct 11, 2007
- Political views 5, Oct 11, 2007–Nov 28, 2007
- Political views 6, Nov 28, 2007–Apr 12, 2008
- Political views 7, Apr 15, 2008–Sep 24, 2008
|
|
|
| Template talk |
|
|
| Categories |
|
|
[edit] Untitled
[edit] The Queen and drug trafficking 2
*Talk:Views_of_Lyndon_LaRouche_and_the_LaRouche_movement/Archive_11#The_Queen_and_drug_trafficking
The last discussion of this issue was archived before we finished with it. Is there anything more to add to the sources page before we start drafting new text for this section? Will Beback talk 11:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Comment moved to #The Queen and drug trafficking 3 Will Beback talk 23:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Actually most of the sources are opinion pieces at best, and not factual sources per se on LaRouche or his "movements" at all. And a lot of this "article" is simply piling on "stuff" instead of restricting it to actual solid material. Adding "stuff" on top of "stuff" is iffy for any BLP article. Cheers. Collect (talk) 11:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
-
- Exactly. Let's clean out the junk and add solidly sourced, NPOV material. Will Beback talk 11:54, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- If you have comments about specific sources you think think we should exclude, that's fine too. Will Beback talk 11:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
-
-
- Start with every single "book review" and the like. And all the "but the person had a beard, so he must have been LaRouche" stuff. Add in the stuff which only serves to broadcast some of the wilder accusations. Cut the article down to about 10K. Cheers. Recall, I regard articles on small groups as properly being covered by BLP, and all opinions in such should be clearly labelled as opinions by specific people at best. Collect (talk) 12:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Huh? This thread is about the Queen of England material. If you have any specific remarks on this topic, please add them. Will Beback talk 12:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- You asked a question. I anse=wered it. I am sorry if the official rule of this thread "This thread is about the Queen of England material. disapproves of more general noting that the entire article has serious BLP issues. Cheers. Collect (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- If you want this thread to be about your general concerns about the article then that's fine. I can start a separate thread to talk about the drafting. Go ahead and say what you want to say. Will Beback talk 22:05, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- AFAICT, you have no special authority on this article, Will. Nor any special authority to declare that you will open a fresh thread just for me. Cheers - I fear that your attitude here is not what I would wish for in a collegial discussion. Collect (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's kind of standard practice to keep a thread on a topic. But sometimes new topics come up. That's fine. We can discuss the overall article in this thread if that's what you want. You wrote, "Start with every single "book review" and the like". I'm not sure what you mean by that. I only see one section that could be called a book review, "Dialectical Economics: An Introduction to Marxist Political Economy". Do you think we should get rid of that? Will Beback talk 22:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- I am glad we have someone to make sure that no thread goes off his stated desired topic. Reminds me a bit of Junior High, in fact. Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm glad you're glad. Now could you please explain your concern about the book reviews? Will Beback talk 23:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Queen and drug trafficking 3
The last discussion of this issue was archived before we finished with it. Is there anything more to add to the sources page before we start drafting new text for this section? Will Beback talk 11:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] For discussion
For the decade prior to the criminal trials of the late 1980s, one of LaRouche's closest aides and his paid security consultant was Roy Frankhouser, a former Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon and American Nazi Party member, and a government informant.[1] This is irrelevant to LaRouche's views. LaRouche's relationship to Frankhouser is explored in depth at Lyndon LaRouche#1974: Contacts with far right groups, intelligence gathering and it is clear that LaRouche was interested in Frankhouser as a government infiltrator of right-wing groups. It is misleading to imply that LaRouche felt any sympathy or agreement for the right-wing groups. Waalkes (talk) 23:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. Cla68 (talk) 23:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{Reflist}} template or a <references /> tag; see the help page.