This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of popular culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Expand : Create a more concrete discussion of relative prevalence of different types of popular culture. Add sections on the major sources of popular culture that have international influence. Discuss the relationship between popular culture and fine art. Discuss the relationship between popular culture and politics; discuss cultural literacy with respect to popular culture. Discuss popular culture studies and a brief summary of the way academics approach popular culture.
This subject is featured in the Outline of culture, which is incomplete and needs further development. That page, along with the other outlines on Wikipedia, is part of Wikipedia's Outline of Knowledge, which also serves as the table of contents or site map of Wikipedia.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved.
" "In popular culture" in popular culture" in popular culture
Great, i came here to make a joke about the idea of an article about the use of "in popular culture" in popular culture. surprise, we have a subsection on this. now, if we can find evidence in popular culture that this recursive meme itself is being spread, we can have a further subsection with the title of this comment. anyone for infinite recursivity? Oh, its in here already...well, that's actually really cool.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Have you ever read []?I've come here by reading the tooltip(mouse over the image)...:D--184.108.40.206 (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
This article needs an In Popular Culture section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
yes, since it already has this section, i agree it needs this section, otherwise the section would no longer exist, and the emptiness therein would become a black hole eating up all of WP:)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
I've renamed this section to "Intertextuality", lifting a prominent word from the contents of section - it's maybe a bit oblique, so if anyone has a better suggestion ("self-reference"?), feel free to change it. Calling the section about self-reference "[Popular culture] in popular culture" seems needlessly confusing to the reader, and I assume it's just there because of the Xkcd gag. --McGeddon (talk) 09:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous user here--I just noticed that, out of the first ten references, about half a dozen are to Christian POV web sites, though the information attributed is general and not POV. Surely there are better (academic, non-biased) sources from which to draw a characterization of popular culture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I really think someone ought to put in a bit about the xkcd cartoon about this. If no one objects, I could work on it, but if someone is better at this stuff, feel free. It's at: http://xkcd.com/446/. Bigroryg (talk) 23:36, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, please see the previous discussions on this in the talk archives (e.g. #29) – there's long consensus it doesn't belong here. Thanks, Bigroryg. –Whitehorse1 00:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand why this section was in the article. It was totally unreferenced and seems to be about propaganda. I've deleted it. Feel free to add it back if you can find some references Bhny (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)