Postmodernism was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I thought that for a page on an important philosophical and cultural movement the reader would be spared the argument that it 'is complex so therefore does not exist'. Do articles on Existentialism or Structuralism have criticism sections that present such base and nonsubstantive arguments? I think not. KingHiggins (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
As a lay person, I could not glean from the summery here what the basic premise of the idea of post-modernism is. Th summery seems to only include information about the history of the concept. Can the article be changed to include an explanation of the idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 16:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
This category is to be deleted shortly. Please would interested editors review the current members in case any should be moved into a sibling category such as Category:Postmodern theory? – FayenaticLondon 06:46, 25 November 2014 (UTC)