Talk:Pretty Little Liars

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pretty Little Liars article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

August 9 to 15, 2015 (21st)

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Keegan Allen[edit]

This actor has never been billed as part of the main cast, even though he has appeared in numerous episodes (though always with a "guest star" billing), and thus, he should not be placed in the "starring" list of the infobox, nor his entry be shown with main cast members in the Cast and Characters section. More at Talk:Pretty Little Liars (season 7)#Addition of Keegan Allen (or other non-main cast members) to infobox or main cast. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Pretty Little Liars - proposed split[edit]

NOT SPLIT

Stale split proposal that did not garner much support. -2pou (talk) 17:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

We should consider forking the awards section out to List of awards and nominations received by Pretty Little Liars. This article is getting long. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support. While that awards and nominations table is pretty large and the article itself is at around 75–80k in size, readable prose, which is the criterion used at WP:SIZESPLIT, is currently at 15k, far below the 40k minimum indicated by the guideline. I'm kinda in the middle about this, as there are other criteria used to determine splitting content out, but that table might have enough in it to allow a split. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – not enough there to justify a split (e.g. almost no prose, so doesn't qualify under WP:SIZESPLIT, and it's not unreasonably large...). And now that the show is over, this section is not going to get any bigger... Aside from that, the current table could use a significant cleanup – e.g. WP:ACCESS fixes, and putting the references in their own column, etc. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per IJBall's reasoning. Brocicle (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.