Prison Break GA Reassessment
GA Sweeps: On hold
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to determine if the article should remain a Good article. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that needs to be addressed.
Address all of the "citation needed" tags. The "Awards and nominations" section is unsourced. The watermark should be removed from File:PB S4 Intro.png and it should be reduced in size. Why is File:Prison Break brothers.jpg needed in the article? It looks like it is being used for decorative purposes. "Season 4" details seem a bit excessive beyond the other seasons, try and trim it a bit. There are a few single sentences throughout the article. To improve the flow of the article, either expand on them or incorporate them into another paragraph. There are multiple free images at Wikimedia Commons. The non-free cast image should be removed to include the free one, along with any other free images you think are relevant to include in the article. There are multiple dead links/redirects that need to be fixed.The Internet Archive can help.
This article covers the topic well. I will review the article's prose once the above issues are addressed. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. If no progress is made, the article may be delisted, which can then later be renominated at WP:GAN. I'll contact all of the main contributors and related WikiProjects so the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'll be happy to help out. I haven't seen the full series yet, so I won't be able to help out with trimming the season 4 summary. However, I can deal with the sourcing and image issues. I think I'm going to rework the article in some areas, and I really hate the television distribution section; it's much too long. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 09:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Only one issue was addressed so far, one week later. I'm going to leave the article on hold for another week. Please address the above points to prevent the article from being delisted. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
GA Sweeps: Kept
Good work addressing the issues. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. I also uploaded the title image at a smaller size and without a watermark. I went through the article and made a few more changes, please review them. I tried to remove all of the past tense occurrences of future events occurring in the show, but it would be beneficial if people actually knowledgeable on the show could give it a read-through and make sure it is all up-to-date. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates for all of the online sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)