This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Correction and Detention Facilities articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I just blanked out the external links section under the grounds that each of those corresponds to an advocacy site designed to press for one specific side of the issue. However, it may be that one or two of those would be suitable; Human Rights Watch has a pretty high stature, so their site is probably okay. ACLU also is a good source, but it suffers from being specifically US based and I know that some people think the ACLU is an extremist group. If anyone wants to add one or more back in, feel free, but keep in mind the requirements of WP:EL. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Good points. I'm in favour of restoring Human Rights Watch as well as ACLU. Opinions that ACLU is extremist are pretty fringe. The vast majority of mainstream media and scholarly sources don't define the organization that way. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I restored both, and added Amnesty International, and moved them into ext links section. Pls feel free to add/remove what you see fit. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)