Talk:Privacy law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Law (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Human rights (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Computer Security / Computing  (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 


Untitled[edit]

This is not correct. Samuel Warren, (who coauthored the Harvard Law review article with Brandeis) and Earl Warren are not one and the same and Sam was never a Supreme Court Justice. I doubt Earl Warren was even born in 1890. Someone should correct this:

"United States Main article: Privacy laws of the United States

The idea of a right to privacy originated in America. Two Supreme Court judges, Justice Warren and Justice Brandeis published and article called 'Right to Privacy' in the Harvard Law Review in (1890) arguing that the constitution and the common law allowed for the deduction of general "right to privacy".[3] Their project was never entirely successful and the renowned tort expert Dean Prosser argued that "privacy" was composed of four separate torts, the only unifying element of which was a (vague) "right to be left alone."[4] These elements were..."

And a link to the article might be nice...

http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/6805/articles/privacy/Privacy_brand_warr2.html 76.103.124.31 (talk) 12:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, I fixed it. But someone should add a link to the article. 76.103.124.31 (talk) 12:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Extend beyond information privacy[edit]

So far the article just seems to deal with information privacy law. It should be expanded to cover laws governing physical privacy as well, or if they are called something else in law, indicate where such can be found.

"The right to be let alone," etc. Zodon (talk) 22:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

This needs references (at least!)[edit]

"At present day, the majority sentiment felt in the United States is that privacy rights no longer really exist. Present day laws clearly permit the government to invade anyone's privacy anytime they feel like it, and there is really not much anyone can do about it."

Excuse me, what??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.82.38 (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

German "Informational self-determination"[edit]

Maybe this should be merged in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informational_self-determination —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.130.90.194 (talk) 22:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

The Drone as Privacy Catalyst[edit]

The Drone as Privacy Catalyst that I added as an external link belongs in the article, but I'm running out of time. --Pawyilee (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2011 (UTC)