This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Oh my gosh this article. Someone please give this at least a modicum of credibility, a footnote, something. The Wikipedia is not a place to carefully document your social justice fantasy roster of accusatory terms, it is for verifiable facts and theories. (188.8.131.52 (talk) 02:33, 12 October 2012 (UTC))
Yep, lots of articles need work...feel free to help out! Drmies (talk) 20:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Yeah this article is kind of ..... whacky and unresearched. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
"a modicum of credibility" If you had clicked through to the specific examples you'd see that. And then you'd see on the talk pages there yet more cries from the privileged that their privilege doesn't exist. There is simply no pleasing the bigots. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 00:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps a great deal of changes have occurred in the time intervening, but I found this article well-substantiated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivamoque (talk • contribs) 00:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)