 |
Project Gutenberg received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
This page has been cited as a source by:
William & Mary Law Review |
[edit] Neutrality Issue
A paragraph under the "criticism" section seemed to lack a neutral point of view and since it was also lacked any citation. I thought it was highly likely that it was original research so I decided to remove it from the article. If someone wants to go through it to fix the neutrality and cite the claims, it is below for easy access:
-
-
- How Project Gutenberg recognizes volunteers' efforts in making classic literary works available to the public has also engendered criticism. Those who do the time-consuming work of producing and donating the initial etext files are typically credited within the introduction. But they may feel that others who later process their donated files are being unrealistically credited as "co-producers." Transforming the utilitarian plain text files that have been the Project Gutenberg staple into an HTML format, for instance, typically requires only a very small fraction of the effort needed to produce the original text file.
(Lexandalf (talk) 23:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC))
[edit] please provide lyrics of the poem
TO, Whomsoever is concern,
I am student of M.A. (Final) and i realy wanted the complete poem of lyrical ballad so that i can read it by heart and get good marks.kindly provide complete details as well as complete poem..
Regards, Pooja Bedi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.118.149 (talk) 08:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
