Talk:Proprietary company
| WikiProject Business | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Australia / Law | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
I am to new a member to rename this page. The correct title should be Proprietary Companies.
What I have put down are the most important points. In my jurisdiction the corporations act is fairly light on these forms of corporations.
[edit] Proprietorships
The term 'proprietorship' is, as far as I know, a generic term referring to private ownership. 'Sole proprietorship' is "the oldest, most common, and simplest form of business organization."[1] Why, I wonder, is 'proprietary company', then, used in the manner here, to refer to a country-specific legal status? User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
This is a legal term of art in australia, which is why it has been used here. I defintiely think the articles should be merged. 199.172.169.7 10:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Marcin
I don't come from south africa but this company type also applies there and the abbreviation pty is common.Sparcosso (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I removed a swear word inserted at the beginning of the article by somebody — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plarter (talk • contribs) 14:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian law articles
- Low-importance Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australia articles