Talk:Pulmonary wedge pressure
| WikiProject Medicine | (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Copyvio
I only reverted what looked like a copyvio from here (cached page). Forgive me if I am wrong. --Joelmills 15:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PCWP in common conditions
the article says that pcwp can differentiate between different causes of heart failure. is it possible to enumerate a few common ones? 78.154.210.148 (talk) 14:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] PAOP is not the same as PAWP or PCP
With reference to the Andrew J. Peacock et al, occluded pulmonary artery pressure (PAOP) is not pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) or pulmonary capillary pressure (PCP). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whyseejosh (talk • contribs) 21:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Removed copy+pasted text from How is it measured? and Why is it measured? sections
[edit] Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cvphysiology.com/Heart%20Failure/HF008.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. eug (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
