|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Shouldn't there be different articles for Punjab, India and Punjab, Pakistan? If there are, they should be mentioned here. - Hemanshu 08:45, 29 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, there are articles for both Punjab, India and Punjab, Pakistan. Sunray 09:11, 2004 Jan 29 (UTC)
There are pretty many stubs in the village sections .. for example Rauni (village). could anyone competent fix those up?
Rice and wheat statistics
Removed this "This why the region contributes to 40% of India's food needs, called "the Granary of India". Indian Punjab produces 40-50% of India's rice, 60-70% of India's wheat. Indian Punjab produces 1% of Rice, 2% of Wheat and 2% of Cotton of the World. "
Imc PLEASE REVIEW OFFICIAL Government Of India Websites, first, before making poorly researched comments on accuracy of data, for this article.
OFFICIAL Government Of India Website for the Indian state of Punjab.
- To the unsigned contributor at 220.127.116.11 who accused me of making poorly researched comments on accurary of data. I'll stand by the accuracy of my comments and data. You have misrepresented the Punjab government data. At http://punjabgovt.nic.in/PUNJABATAGLANCE/AgricultureEconomy.htm it says "Percentage contribution of wheat and rice to the Central Pool is 64.1 and 42 respectively,...”. This does not contradict the figures given at the IRRI site at all, since that refers to the total production, of the state and of the country.
- You have transformed the above statement at the Punjab government site to - “Indian Punjab produces 40-50% of India's rice, 60-70% of India's wheat.” . This is about as inaccurate an interpretation of statistics as you can get. The 'Central Pool' is the stock of food held by the central government, for reserves, price control purposes, et.c. Punjab could well be the major contributor to that. But you are confusing it with the total production of the country, which is vastly greater. Another similar sized region might conceivably have the same productivity as Punjab, but if it exported most of its production, then its contribution to the central pool could be zero.
- I've removed the misinterpreted statistics again. Feel free to put them back in, with an adequate reference to the central pool, (which should then include an explanation of what it is).
- Imc 30 June 2005 17:03 (UTC)
Irrespective of your speculative comments on the central pool. You should NOT have removed "Indian Punjab produces 1% of Rice, 2% of Wheat and 2% of Cotton of the World." This data is from an official Indian government website and CANNOT be white washed. As a westerner from the EU, your behaviour has provided me with an insight of your mind's prejudices against this state. You should accept this "Indian Punjab produces 1% of Rice, 2% of Wheat and 2% of Cotton of the World." In addition this state per capita leads the rest of India. This state, Punjab, is small in size compared to the average size Indian state. One can only imagine how this state could transform India for the better if it was bigger (if average sized). When I think of the individual states of India, this state's per capita output stands as beacon of hope. The richest people (on average) in the Indian union per capita are Punjabi. The current PM, Dr Singh, of India came from this state and it was his philosophy of economic liberalization that led to the excellent economic growth, from the rubbish growth before. Most people from EU are most impressed with this state, Punjab, than any other state in India- the people and impressive results. One can only imagine how this state could transform India for the better if it was bigger (if average sized) and not small.
- Paul Keaton 30 June 2005 20:03.
This article should make adequate mention of Haryana. There are some references, and I've added a few more. But this state is also part of the historic region of Punjab, even if it no longer bears the name. Imc 09:50, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
So, when was partition reversed?
>"The area that is now known as the Greater Punjab comprises what were once vast territories of eastern Pakistan and northern western India."
I did not know India and Pakistan had been reunified! (It appears that [this] bit of copyediting inadvertently reversed the time sense of the sentence.)
Requested move 23 October 2013
Ordering of the largest cities in the Punjab by population
How are the cities ordered by population? Using urban area, metropolitan area, or city proper? For example the National Capital Territory of Delhi as a metropolis is listed here. Delhi is also listed as a city proper here (even though it is not, New Delhi is the only city proper within Delhi, I think). The massive urban area of Delhi is here (this area also includes parts that are not a part of Delhi as a territory, if contiguous can include regions from neighboring regions that may be part of other states). Zaketo (talk) 00:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Population figures for the cities are not given in the article as they would rapidly become out of date and across the whole region there is no published consistent basis which could be used for comparison. The list in the Major cities section is roughly in the order of the population figures given in individual articles on each city. Delhi is not included in the table because it is India's National Capital Territory and is more like a state or province. A population figure for the whole region is given in the article's infobox. It is ridiculously out of date. I reckon it also should be removed. Apuldram (talk) 11:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Land of saints?
I have moved the following section here from the article:
“===Land of Saints=== The Punjab region is sometimes referred to as the land of saints as quite a large number of famous saints are rooted to Punjab. The most prominent amongst them being the founder of Sikhism himself Baba Guru Nanak, eminent saint of the Subcontinent, the Sufi poet Baba Bulleh Shah, Fariduddin Ganjshakar, Shah Hussain, Baha-ud-din Zakariya and many other.”
I have removed it from the article because it ignores several Wikipedia guidelines:
- “. . is sometimes referred to . .” is a weasel. It appears to support the statement but denies the reader the opportunity to discover the source of the information. Googling ‘’Land of Saints’’ scores hits on Ireland, Cornwall and Umbria in Italy, but not the Punjab. A verifiable authoritative source is needed for the asertion.
- the section contains peacock words – famous, eminent.
- Guru Nanak is revered as the founder of Sikhism, but is not labelled as a saint in the Wikipedia article about him. Again, a verifiable authoritative source is needed.
- The Sufi poets mentioned are in the List of Sufi saints. They could be included in the section ‘’Religions’’.
- “. . and many other.” More weasel.
Apuldram (talk) 20:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe the section was not properly written, but nevertheless, the article would improve if such a category is added.
- The section heading would be more appropriate if renamed as The Punjab-Home of Master-Saints or The Punjab-Home of Saints.
- To support the section with verifiable sources of information we can add these links  and .
- True that Guru Nanak was the founder of Sikhism but he was also a saint as confirmed here 
- A Subcategory within Religion can be added.
- I hope that answers your inquiry.