Talk:Quaker Council for European Affairs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Christianity / Quakers (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject European Union (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Human rights (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Notability[edit]

If evidence of notability is not provided, then I am nominating this article for deletion. I am not saying that it isn't notable; just that this article doesn't give any proof as to that notability. J Milburn 20:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Can you explain what you mean by 'proof'? --Ahc 05:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I have since become rather convinced that this group is notable, and this article is now better sourced. However, what I meant at the time was mention of two independent, reliable, verifiable, non-trivial references to this group, as is explained here. J Milburn 18:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I see what happened, between when you posted and I asked, the verifiable references were provided, hence my confusion about your concern. It had already been fixed when I got here. --Ahc 05:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)