This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Re: the tag questioning notability, I would argue that the list of notable contributors makes this medium for their articles notable. Several notable scholars associated with the journal are listed in the intro, with others in the list section below. DickClarkMises 22:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The list of notable contributors seems to be completely superfluous, other journal articles don't do this either, such lists are inherently arbitrary, and notability is not inherited. --Crusio (talk) 17:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree that notability is not inherited. The journal is notable in its own right, though mostly for its comedy value. RomanSpa (talk) 06:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
