Talk:Radical Women

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Politics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Gender Studies (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Gender Studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Organizations (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Organizations. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Feminism (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Socialism (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

“Strong Stance”[edit]

“In addition to their core feminist beliefs, they take a strong stance on racism and gay rights.”

What stance do they take?—Rory 17:50, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)

"Nice edit"[edit]

Nice edit, Doctor Matt. If you'd like to point out specific area you think improvement, I'll do my best to comply.--HG, 3/15/07

Merle Woo reference[edit]

Since the Merle Woo mention already links to the Wikipedia article about her, I thought the extra reference that was supplied (which is available in the Woo article) made the sentence a bit awkward. It's here if someone feels really strongly about it needing to be there: <ref>Merle Woo, Matt & Andrej Koymasky.</ref> - Jlandahl 20:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

NPOV[edit]

I think this article reads like an op-ed piece in favor of the organization. Whoever wrote it clearly wants everyone to know how great Radical Women is. I am going to be working on cleaning up the severe tone problems when I get time. ausa کui × 21:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying, Ryan. If you could be even more specific, I could help fix the article. Thanks. Doctormatt 03:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Since you've not responded, and not made any edits to the article, I removed the tag. The article seems pretty good to me, tone-wise. It mostly states what RW states, and it is clear that this is RW's opinion. There are quite a few citations (for the length of the article). If you still have things to say about the tone of the article, I'd love to hear them. Doctormatt 21:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)