Talk:Rap God

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rap God article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Rap God. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Rap God at the Reference desk.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Eminem High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eminem, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eminem on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EminemWikipedia:WikiProject EminemTemplate:WikiProject EminemEminem articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Popular Culture (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular CultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular CulturePopular Culture articles

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Notability / Redirect[edit]

The number of sources and content justify its current state of existence. Additionally, how am I able to add any content if it keeps getting reverted to a redirect by the time I save it? Zach Vega (talk to me) 09:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to not revert you, just put a {{in use}} or {{under construction}}. Then I am aware you are working on the article. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 10:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Homophobia criticisms[edit]

Not for nothing, but where is the mention of the criticism for use of homophobic slurs within the song that is currently making news? It can have its sentence on being praised generally, but you can't ignore the backlash coming from the gay community which is currently making news (a Google news search should lead anyone to legitimate news sources to verify the criticisms over content).174.126.239.232 (talk) 10:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's not really a point of putting a criticism of homophobic slurs on every Eminem article in which he says "faggot" or "gay". Wikipedia can't have every possible opinion on everything. From the man himself about undue weight:

If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Wikipedia regardless of whether it is true or not and regardless of whether you can prove it or not, except perhaps in some ancillary article.

The song has been receiving extremely positive critical reception, and a criticism from a small group because he says "faggots" isn't significant enough to mention in critical reception. Zach Vega (talk to me) 19:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The homophobic lyrics controversy should be included. Look at all these credible sources, documenting and/or criticizing the lyrics:

Eminem has even responded himself to the criticisms on Rolling Stone:nischaycs@gmail.com≈ http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/exclusive-eminem-responds-to-rap-god-homophobia-accusations-20131104 Soulbust (talk) 00:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With that amount of coverage in reliable sources, and a response by the artist, it should definitely be included in the article. STATic message me! 00:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any need to include Hotstylez diss?[edit]

http://www.xxlmag.com/news/2013/11/hotstylz-releases-eminem-diss-track-rap-fraud/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.87.234 (talk) 14:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How many words?[edit]

The article contradicts itself, stating the song contains both 1551 and 1560 words in different places in the article. Is this an error, or is there another explanation? like different versions of the song, or disagreement on if something is one or two words etc, but it's not explained, and both quote Guinness World Records so they should be the same? Carlwev 08:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Linked on Reddit[edit]

I'm just letting watchers of this page know that this article was linked on Reddit, as can be seen here due to a redirect on this page. Please remember to be vigilant and revert any vandalism that may or may not come from this link. Thanks! jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

World record reverts[edit]

I have edited the part about the world record and it being beaten by Harry Shotta at least 4 times over the last few months and it always gets deleted immediately, anyone know why this might be? I am completely and utterly new to editing wiki articles though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarkey1984 (talk • contribs) 16:53, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

If, when looking at the article, you click the "History" tab, you will see all of the edits.

When you first made the change, you weren't logged in, so your IP address shows. The next edit is Oshwah reverting your edit with a comment that you had added new material without citing a reliable source. Oshwah also added a note to the IP talk page (here) explaining that.

You then added the same material using your new account. Koala15 then reverted your edit. They neglected to use an edit summary or add a note to your talk page. I'd imagine it's for the same reason. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the current world record[edit]

Harry Shotta pushes boundaries on 'Animal' as he hammers out a World Record of 1,771 words on the track, beating Eminem's previous record of 1,560 with 'Rap God'

Mr. Cii Remix[edit]

I think there needs to be a bit for the remix included on Curtain Call 2 Ginger Eminem (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]