The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.
Please be neutral when editing this highly sensitive article. It discusses a topic about which people have diverse opinions.
This is not a forum for general discussion about (Babri Masjid Demolition). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about (Babri Masjid Demolition) at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk. (additional comments)
Please be calm and civil when you make comments or when you present evidence, and avoid personal attacks. Please be patient as we work toward resolution of the issues in a peaceful, respectful manner.
Please discuss removing content which is cited/backed up by a reliable source here first before removing it. If you wish to counter a claim made by a reliable source, find another reliable source and add it to the article, summarising what it says, thus providing readers with both sides of points of view. Further edit warring over cited content without discussion may lead to page protection and blocks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Hmm. You want us to add "Mr. Haque has joined the RSS" to the article? --regentspark (comment) 12:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, to prove that the idea of RSS being anti-Muslim is just an academic conspiracy. I am ok to add it if I can also add that the RSS has used its Muslim members/sympathisers to terrorist bomb other Muslims.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kautilya3 (talk • contribs)
A "wing"? That is a new word! Should we also call the BJP a political "wing" of the RSS? Kautilya3 (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry people. But lacking scholarly sources, none of this stuff is worthy of adding to the article. We could, if you like, add Mr. Haque's RSS membership to Mazharul Haque because it is pertinent there. --regentspark (comment) 18:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Not significant enough. I note that it is included in the affiliated organizations list and that's probably the best place for it. If, at some time, scholarly sources highlight the importance of this (or any other) affiliated organization, then I suppose we could consider adding something about it. --regentspark (comment) 01:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
I'd agree with RP here. We cannot mention all of the 20 odd affiliates of the RSS in the lede; and among those affiliates, the MRM certainly does not have the sort of coverage required to set it apart. It should, and is, mentioned in the "affiliated organisations" section. Though god knows those descriptions could use work. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
-Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh abbreviated as RSS (IPA:Rāṣṭrīya Svayansēvaka Saṅgha) (pronunciation: [rɑːʂˈʈriːj(ə) swəjəmˈseːvək ˈsəŋɡʱ], lit. "National Volunteer Organization" or National Patriotic Organization) is a right-wing charitable, educational, volunteer, Hindu nationalist, non-governmental organization-
Right wing politics is defined by Wikipedia itself as -Right-wing politics are political positions or activities that view some forms of social stratification or social inequality as either inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, typically justifying this position on the basis of natural law or tradition-
So the term right wing is obviously not attributable to RSS because they try to eliminate inequalities in society at least in principle. So RSS is not a Right wing group. Please edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Not done Unfortunately, the material you want removed is well sourced. Note that Wikipedia does not define anything, we merely use whatever reliable sources state. --regentspark (comment) 14:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)