The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.
Please discuss removing content which is cited/backed up by a reliable source here first before removing it. If you wish to counter a claim made by a reliable source, find another reliable source and add it to the article, summarising what it says, thus providing readers with both sides of points of view. Further edit warring over cited content without discussion may lead to page protection and blocks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Threads older than 90 days may be archived by MiszaBot I.
This is not a forum for general discussion about (Babri Masjid Demolition). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about (Babri Masjid Demolition) at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk. (additional comments)
Sarsanghchalak has meaning only in context of RSS. This article cannot be expanded beyond a definition and list of people who held the post. It is better to club it in RSS page. Jyoti (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Support per proposer. A cursory search of sources does not show me anything that would be too detailed for this page. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Jyoti, why don't you go ahead and boldly merge the page? You're not getting much response. Vanamonde93 (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Lead is overloaded with many references, it is hard for a reader to grasp content. You should remove references from lead and keep them in other sections. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Edit Request: RSS is not just a cultural organization
In the opening paragraph of the page, it is mentioned that RSS is a cultural organization is not at all true. It is the mother organization of Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP), a political party in India and currently in power. There are numerous links to credible sources to prove this point. Therefore, I request an edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katyaan (talk • contribs) 06:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)