Talk:Region

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Geography (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Cleanup tag[edit]

What sort of clean up further work rather than clean up, unless I'm missing something... what did the clean up tagger have in history??—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.13.36.197 (talk) 01:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

The Region of New Mexico is In most regions, region. This is wrong. But I don't know how to fix it!91.110.253.210 (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

bluebaeyypie[edit]

Dont use wikipidia people can change it you itdiots!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.58.234.120 (talk) 22:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Subregions.svg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

100px An image used in this article, File:Subregions.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.


This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

HELLO TALK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.181.136.198 (talk) 20:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Military regions[edit]

I think the "military region" subsection (along with the technical description box) belongs in its own article or maybe a related military-specific article. Thoughts or plans to change? 71.22.207.207 (talk) 19:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)