Talk:Remittance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Finance (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Merge proposal[edit]

I put up a proposal to merge this page with Remittances from overseas. These articles cover the same topic. The question is which title to use. I think "remittances" works the best.--Bkwillwm 02:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Agreed! - tk, 0643(GMT), 2006-03-30

Seeing as how the merge/redirect seems to have been completed, I'm going to remove the tag. --Betterliving 18:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Other meaning[edit]

There is another meaning of Remittances Discussed here : "Remittance also refers to the accounting concept of a monetary payment transferred by a customer to a business" I think more light should be thrown on this topic alongwith the discussed concept of money transfer from forigners.

Which countries benefit[edit]

This article should be expanded to include just how much each of the countries in the mentioned regions benefit from remmitances.

what about africans?!! --Nonchablunt 20:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Need to add research institutes and links to work[edit]

I added some external links to work on emergencies (of which I'm a part). I'll look to add links to the leading development and finance institutes working on remittances next (unless someone else does it first).

eg world bank remittances research asian development bank inter-american development bank 62.173.69.98 14:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)K Savage, ODI

Top ten remittance recipient countries[edit]

It would be better if the table of "Top ten remittance recipient countries" instead listed the countries whose share of remittance in GDP is the highest, not absolute value. France might get 12 billion in remittances, but that's peanuts compared to its overall GDP as opposed to say, Haiti, which probably gets much less in absolute value but where the remittances are much larger relative to the overall size of the economy.radek (talk) 00:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Israel is obviously by mistake on the list. If at all, it is a big importer of foreign labor, mainly from the Philippines, Nepal and India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.244.22.182 (talk) 05:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Useless disambiguation notice[edit]

The disambiguation notice at the top of the page is fairly useless; the article it links to does not mention remittance at all, indicating a need for it to be covered in the accounting sense on this article. Is there any reason why that meaning is not covered here? If not, is it worth tagging this article for the attention of someone who can explain the concept? me_and (talk) 13:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not plagarize[edit]

I just reverted two large additions that were put in by Pdevasconcelos. The text had no citations, but when I entered a chunk of the text into Google, it appeared to have been taken wholesale from other sources.Notmyrealname (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move Parsecboy (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Remittancesremittance — Page title should be in the singular remittance rather than the plural, remittance. — •••Life of Riley (TC) 20:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Social Remittances[edit]

The UN Human Development Report for 2009 on migration includes references to a concept known as "social remittances," which is an explanation of the finding that origin communities of migrants tend to experience upticks in demographic measures such as female literacy and other social rather than purely economic factors. If there are more sources for this term, it might warrant inclusion in this article in a short subsection. --Thomas Btalk 04:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Major Changes and Expansions[edit]

A colleague and I would like to provide updated 2010 statistics from the World Bank on the section titled "Top recipient countries." We also would like a broad description of the economic benefits remittances provide for top recipient countries. For the subsection titled "Asia," we would like to add a more nuanced description of the Philippines and Latin America. Lastly, for the section titled "Potential security concerns," we are proposing to insert a link connecting it to the page Migrant worker. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. DArquero (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC) FaithSara (talk) 02:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Data World Migration Report (IOM)[edit]

The International Office for Migration (IOM) publishes the World Migration Report every year with interesting updated data on remittances. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.214.46.159 (talk) 08:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Removed references[edit]

the following block of "references" was not used in ref-tags in the article and thus are hard to calssify. Additionally the first in the list is a dead link and most are poorly documenting of what they actually reference:

  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • Ezra Rosser, Immigrant Remittances, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [5]

--Giszmo (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

The kind of remittance discussed here is a specialized form, not the most common kind[edit]

In normal usage, a remittance is a sum of money that is sent as a payment. The kind of remittances discussed in this article are an important phenomenon but I think it would be better to make it clear in the article title that its subject is not remittances in general but the specific kind discussed here. This is important because other articles (Balance (accounting), for example) that use remittance in its broader, more general sense, link to this article.

Related to this problem, the disambiguation is ineffective and misleading. D.Holt (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)