Talk:Remote viewing

---

remote desktop / remote access

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Remote_viewing&diff=next&oldid=338636353

I added this because I know 'vnc viewer' is what most vnc client software clals iteself. I wasn't trying to be funny. What's people's opinions on this? I know they are in different subject areas but the names are similar enough to be confusing imo. —Crazytales (talk) 06:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Recent developments in Remote Viewing

The article does not seem to accurately reflect the current state of Remote Viewing. Recent developments in Physics, ascribed to Stephen Hawking no less, point towards a Multiverse view of the Universe. This is a simple extension of the Four Dimensional view of Einstein taking into account the unresolved queries of Kaluza-Klein. Similarly no reference is made to the extensive works of Jung where a central postulate is the reach of the Psyche into areas beyond our comprehension. Declassified programs have lead to the recent release of GeoLoc and RVChronos which are very helpful in providing evidence for the veracity of the Remote Viewing protocols. There is a sneaking suspicion that Intelligence Agencies might use debunking as a convenient way of hiding evidence that would compromise their darker secrets. In all a biased and unhelpful article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eiscan (talk • contribs) 18:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

What is project Starlight?

Inserted here:

"'In 2000 it is alleged that the United States Military under the Defense Intelligence Agency has resumed experiments in remote viewing and intelligence gathering operations under project Starlight. DIA Analyst Michael Serris, the rising star in the military's remote viewing program has disappeared under mysterious circumstances and the fate of the program is unknown."[1]

Their website describes them as a private initiative to get UFO information from the government. If no reliable sources are provided for remote viewing involvement, I'll just go and remove it. --Enric Naval (talk) 00:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, so Project Starlight is a conspiracy theory society, and now the editor has added claims that a living person has "disappeared under mysterious circumstances". I am removing this until someone can provide something that passes for a reliable source. --Enric Naval (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Project Starlight the conspiracy theory society and the project under the DIA is named coincidentally and has nothing to do with each other. From project Stargate to project Starlight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdward (talk • contribs) 08:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, ok, I believe you. But from what source did you get this information? From a website, a book, a newspaper article, a blog, a forum? You need to cite sources for the information.

(The only thing I can find not related to Greer is a forum post with an alleged email filtration [2]). --Enric Naval (talk) 09:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

real experiments with RM through a cat?

It probably doesn't go along with this article's subject but it IS remote viewing, I came here looking for it. Anyone hear of this/have a source, for a research project where they had electrodes on a cat's head and saw through its eyes? a wiki article relevant to it? anything? Batvette (talk) 11:43, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

This article is a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.137.143.64 (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Modify Early Background

I've reinstated the short historical background material, which summarizes the citations from skeptics Hyman (ProcIEEE 1986) and Wade (Science 1973). It seems to provide a better context for the opening description of Putoff & Targ's research, which otherwise sounds like they started the work completely out of the blue. jxm (talk) 17:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)