Talk:Repeated measures design

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Statistics (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or join the discussion.

Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mathematics rating:
Start Class
High Importance
 Field: Probability and statistics

This article seems to be about crossover designs, which is a very small subclass of repeated measures designs (although very important)[edit]

WARNING: The introduction needs significant editing. This article seems to think that repeated measures designs are identical with crossover studies. An experienced editor should flag this article with a WARNING, imho. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

I removed the worst confusions (crossover=repeated measurements) and the toxic references. There are two on-line references given (to lecture notes), which did not horrify me, so I left them, but I am sure that better on-line references can be found. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 19:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
I think what is missing in this article is an explanation what Repeated measures design IS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.133.174.126 (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

This article needs much more editing on the advantages and disadvantages if anyone would like to do that. counterbalancing, order effects (of which practice effects is a part of), latin squares, and time interval between treatments are all not mentioned and are big parts of repeated measures design. also i think that the crossover studies should just be under "see also"

in addition, longitudinal studies are not a subset of Repeated measures design. they can be used in independent groups design as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.223.183 (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Minke, 2006[edit]

Can someone please put a more complete reference in for "Minke, 2006"? --Slashme (talk) 07:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I've just figured it out: The date is a typo. --Slashme (talk) 07:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


Assumptions of repeated measures ANOVA[edit]

I believe that the assumption of normality is incorrect. The sample mean of each condition should be normally distributed. Normality of the dependent variable is sufficient to guarantee normality of the sample mean, but it is not necessary (see the Central Limit Theorem). Bradknox (talk) 04:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)