Talk:Replisome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Genetics (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genetics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genetics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

A table listing the enzymes and their tasks should be added. An image would also be helpful. --Artman40 12:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

More information for replisome[edit]

http://research.chem.psu.edu/sjbgroup/T4Replisome/T4mainpage.html http://www.wehi.edu.au/education/wehi-tv/dna/replication.html These links should help to organize the article. --Artman40 15:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Replisome Pro/Euk[edit]

There are some significant differences in replisome factors between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. What's the best way to make sure these differences are made clear?

This article is missing lots of major pieces:

  • In addition to preventing the formation of hairpins, the combination of SSB/RPA + single strand serves as a better substrate for the polymerisation reaction that takes place inside DNA polymerase III.
  • There is almost no discussion about clamp loader/clamp or pre-initiation / initiation complex.
  • There is almost no discussion about how error correction works in DNA polymerase III.
  • There is almost no discussion about processivity.

Thermodynamic (talk) 04:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Is anyone interested in coming up with a realistic table of contents? I can contribute significant portions of the writing for the article, but I'd really like community involvement for the TOC. Thermodynamic (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)