Talk:Revolution Software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Video games (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Adventure games task force.
 
WikiProject Yorkshire (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Revolution Software is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Former good article nominee Revolution Software was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Importance[edit]

This Article should be Highly Important, because Revolution Software made one of the most successful Adventure Classics of All Time! Plus - it was found by a Legendof the Gaming Industry: Charles Cecil! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7arazred (talkcontribs) 12:42, 17 September 2011

Per the Importance scale for WikiProject Video games, companies are ranked Top-importance (article forms the basis of all information) if they are highly influential companies, particularly the major Japanese, American, and European companies involved in video game production, e.g. Blizzard Entertainment, Capcom, Nintendo; they are ranked High-importance (article covers a general area of knowledge) if they are top developers and publishers, e.g. Epic Games, Neversoft; they are ranked Mid-importance (article fills in general knowledge of specialized topics) if they are most other well-known companies in the industry, e.g. IGN, Gamestop, Naughty Dog; and Low-importance otherwise. Personally I'm reluctant to go even as high as Mid-importance, because no evidence has been provided of this company being well-known, so I think that Low-importance is justified. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
I personally think the company is mid-to-high (leaning to high) importance, since you could say it "has been proven notable (more will be added)."

3rd GA nomination quick-failed[edit]

I am removing the current GAN on this, as none of the concerns from the previous GANs have been addressed. Please stop re-nominating this article for GAN as multiple reviewers have already shown how this fails by a mile. Consider this a quick-fail on the nomination. –MuZemike 21:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality[edit]

13 articles
C-Class article Revolution Software
Charles cecil.jpg
B-Class article Charles Cecil
C-Class article Tony Warriner
B-Class article Steve Ince
Good article Virtual Theatre
Good article Lure of the Temptress
C-Class article Beneath a Steel Sky
Good article In Cold Blood
Good article Broken Sword
A-Class article Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars
Good article Broken Sword II: The Smoking Mirror
Good article Broken Sword: The Sleeping Dragon
Good article Broken Sword: The Angel of Death